but one of the things that has started to come out has been this supposedly fundamental divide between “consumers” and “customers”. The idea – I think it’s from Cluetrain, but I’ll check later – is that being a customer is far superior than being a consumer and that the distinction is fundamental. Maybe, but remember that a “citizen” has a far richer bundle of rights and responsibilities than either. If people are really trying to suggest that we fight for rights as customers, I’d suggest that the battle has already been lost – the real fight should be for rights as citizens. Being a customer implies that your rights flow from a transaction. Weak weak weak. Being a citizen implies that your rights flow from having been born (or naturalized). That’s where the stakes are really high, not in the world of consumerism OR customerism.
Jonathan Peterson
deconstructs Peter Chernin’s Comdex Keynote at Way.Nu. Peter Chernin is the CEO of Fox. Declan McCullagh has made an un-annotated trasncript available on PoliTech.
Posted without comment:
stevenberlinjohnson.com. OK, one comment: Yay!
Doc Searls covers radio very well,
and today he points to a San Antonio Current article about Clear Channel that demonstrates a point I’ve been making for years. The CDA was NOT the worst part of the Telecom Reform Act. It was a smoke screen to divert attention from the negative effects of the concentration of media ownership, which is much more efficient by any measure than overt censorship at ensuring that diverse views go unheard, unpublished.
If here was any question about US motivations,
surely this article in Oil and Gas International will clear it up. I don’t, of course, think it’s as simple as “Bush wants more oil for the US” – not by a longshot. But, as Billy Bragg wrote recently, the price of oil is significant in this whole thing.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 262
- 263
- 264
- 265
- 266
- …
- 573
- Next Page »