this is mikel.org

Michael Boyle's weblog

  • home
  • archives
  • about
  • words

Diouf Article

April 2, 2019 by Michael Boyle

Secularism: Here We Go Again!
Boucar Diouf
Comedian, storyteller, biologist and host

I look forward to this issue being resolved so that we can simply return to the extremes of the debate on this subject that has divided Quebec for so long.

I am talking about people who very often wrongly associate everything that disturbs them with xenophobia by mixing religion, culture, race and identity in episodes that often make the headlines. But I am also talking about these xenophobes who almost absurdly believe that secularism should be a program to ban religions in the public space of a country where freedom of conscience is a fundamental right.

It is true that at the heart of the tension, it is above all the small groups of fundamentalists who aspire to mix religion and politics, who confront [one another] in social networks, with the complicity of traditional media; people whose intolerance or militant atheism suggests that religion is an epiphenomenon that simple reason and scientific argument should be enough to annihilate. It was the famous Voltaire syndrome that predicted that it would take no more than a century to find the Bible only in antique shops. It can be said that he was royally mistaken, because the Bible is still a timeless international bestseller.

Chase away the supernatural and it returns to the bungalow! This is what Quebec, which thought it had put religion in its place, is discovering with the opening of borders.

[This is] a situation that causes excessive panic among some people. What do you expect, when you have rowed so hard to get [Quebec] out of the clutches of a form of religious totalitarianism for much of its history? It is absolutely normal to be suspicious of any other form of cabal. He who has already been bitten by a snake sometimes distrusts his shoelaces, my grandfather used to say. Unfortunately, if we are too suspicious, we sometimes end up jumping needlessly at lures carefully manipulated by those who benefit from making us overreact.

We must put an end to this duel of extremes where nuance and restraint are rarely applauded by the most bellicose. In one corner, there are people who falsely think that to immigrate is to give up who you are and become identical to the other who welcomes you. And at the other end, there are those who ask everyone to adapt to the introduction of their culture in its entirety, because the slightest compromise is not an option for them. Between these two extreme, small groups that tear the social fabric apart, there is the silent majority who are called xenophobes or insulted in their sincere and deep beliefs.

Yet, with all due respect to extremists on all sides, living together is a search for consensus. Therefore, it requires walking towards each other. It is therefore a big mistake to allow the most radical to proclaim themselves as the spokespersons on such an important and divisive issue. The only way to remove the spittoon is to draw a clear line for everyone.

Secularism is a movement that was on the march in Quebec long before its borders were massively opened to immigration. I am one of those who believe that it is an important pillar of “living together” that wishes to celebrate “together” more than simply “living.” This separation between state and religion does not erase anyone’s belongings and beliefs. On the contrary, it arranges the terrain such that it is sheltered from representations, because no ostentatious sign of belonging is as banal and innocent as its wearer would have us believe.

Imagine if Richard Henry Bain found himself in front of a judge wearing a Parti Québécois badge. Would the magistrate succeed in convincing him that this sign would have no effect on his final decision? The same logic applies to conspicuous religious symbols among state employees with coercive powers. What would an immigrant of Palestinian origin think, for example, if he contests his conviction by a judge wearing a yarmulke?

On the other hand, what would a young motorist wearing a yarmulke think when a police officer in a hijab gives him a questionable ticket?

In the three previous examples, we can bet that the signs displayed will, rightly or wrongly, be automatically associated with an anticipated feeling of injustice.

For 13 years, all elections in Quebec have been haunted by secularism and it is clear that it is the irresponsibility of the PQ and the PLQ that has led to the widespread deterioration of the situation we are now facing. Largely mandated by the population to draw a demarcation line, the Legault government courageously decided to take the bull by the horns. But Legault will have to hang on tight, because a storm is coming, and I am not just talking about the victimization campaigns sponsored by the self-righteous left, whose cultural relativism seems to have become the only social project.

Premier Legault may tell his troops to exercise restraint, but the storm will be big and inevitable, especially if he himself continues to make the link between secularism and the protection of Quebec’s identity. Secularism is a simple principle of separation between the State and religion, and associating it with the protection of an identity is just ammunition to those who say that this project is against them.

In addition to the rebellion within Quebec, which is being organized on a massive scale, the Legault government will also have to deal with missiles from the media and intellectual elite of Canadian multiculturalist anglophones, who will call French-speaking Quebec every name in the book. It will also demand that the Trudeau government respond with guns ablaze as well. In other words, after the SNC-Lavalin affair, a new Quebec hot potato is emerging for the Trudeau government, which will have to deal with this issue – and which has all the potential to turn into an electoral dynamite fatal to the LPC.

The Quebec Liberal Party would also be wise not to demonize this project too much if it does not want to drag a heavy weight into the next election campaign. For good reason – if the PLQ demonizes the CAQ initiative, it will have no choice but to tell its traditional electorate what it will do with this law once it returns to power. In short, the PLQ will have to promise during the election campaign to change everything once again. This would be the beginning of its final crucifixion with respect to the French-speaking vote, because those who believe that this issue will die quietly are royally mistaken – it touches too deep a fiber in Quebec. Fortunately for the PLQ, the floor on this issue is given to a person of restraint and discernment named Hélène David.

Between British free-for-all multiculturalism and French-style secularism, Quebec has every right to find a fine line of social consensus.

In England, multiculturalism is a boiling pot with a tightly screwed lid, pressure is building up and we refuse to see that the explosion is imminent. In France, the boiling pot is uncovered and the hot splashes emanating from it cause irreparable burns to the idea of “living together.” In Quebec, what we need is a simple valve to relieve the excess pressure from our formula – which we wish to be more intercultural. Of course, the whistling of hot steam will silence people abundantly by summer.

I look forward to when discussion on this subject will be exhausted, so we can talk about the issues that are much more important to the vast majority of immigrants. I am thinking here of the recognition of prior learning and diplomas, the lack of openness of professional orders to graduates from elsewhere. There is also the very high unemployment rate in some immigrant communities, discrimination in employment, the representativeness of minorities in state institutions and the lack of investment in francization and employability programs that help those who manage to see the light that illuminated their dreams of expatriates.

Anil Dash: We’re not being alarmist enough about climate change…

December 9, 2018 by Michael Boyle

I don’t read my RSS feeds as much as I used to, and there are a lot of blogs in there that I haven’t actively followed in years – mostly from the very early days of blogging. One such blog is that of Anil Dash – he doesn’t write like he used to either!

However, he published a very good piece at the beginning of October that I think bears some attention: We’re (still) not being alarmist enough about climate change.

Tags: Anil Dash, Environment, International Affairs

Learning about Gutenberg

March 19, 2018 by Michael Boyle

I went to a WordPress Meetup tonight to try and catch up with Gutenberg, which is supposedly launching in April. Shannon Smith from the WordPress.com VIP team did a very nice job with the presentation, and kind of set aside some of my concerns. But not entirely.

What is Gutenberg, you ask?

Gutenberg is the next-gen editor code and (seemingly) baseline technology being baked into WordPress for V5, which is supposed to drop on April 18th. It changes – utterly and entirely – the editing interfaces in WordPress – but also there are plans for this technology to permeate all of WordPress, and be the default editor but also the default interface for plugins and all sorts of other things.

The problem is that there are so many unknowns that it's really hard to get a handle on what this really means. For instance, I make extensive use of tables, and have a plugin (not on this site, on my "production" sites – all 25 of them) to handle this. How will this interact with Gutenberg? Not sure. In theory, I'd create a shortcode block, paste the table's shortcode there and it will just work.

But expecting things to just work is difficult when just two paragraphs up, I found no way, using Gutenberg, to do something basic like formatting the  "th" as a superscript! And below this 'graf is an image I would want to align right and wrap around  – but there doesn't seem to be a way to do that.

M Logo

Oh Hai this is OK.

This text is wrapping around the image. I kind of wish it could flow itself around, but who knows maybe this will be OK.

Found a way to do the superscript as well, though it's a slow solution.

One thing I still can't do is check the contents of the text box in Antidote, which is a must-do for every post published. I suppose I could write, switch to text mode and then do it. But I currently write only in plain text, so why would I want to do that?

OK so that worked – to some extent. There was some automatic formatting (curly quotes and the like) that made Antidote puke, so I'd want to (have to) override that.

Columnizing text is kind of interesting, but I'm not sure I could paste it into columns… which sort of defeats the purpose.

Overall, although I'm pretty positive about the potential for this, to be responsible my only approach can be to find ways to protect myself from this. And I have to say, I kind of resent WordPress for basically inventing a whole boatload of work I'm going to have to do just to not break anything…

From the “I thought I’d heard it all” file

April 22, 2017 by Michael Boyle

Rex Murphy’s passionate appeal for Canada to honour Réné Levesque.

Watch:

Tags: Canadian Politics, CBC, History, Réné Lévesque, Rex Murphy

One year since his passing: The Day Prince’s Guitar Wept the Loudest

April 22, 2017 by Michael Boyle

Look, I’m not sure if “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” is one of the greatest terrible songs ever written, or perhaps one of the worst great songs, but one night in 2004 something magical happened as an all-star group was joined by one of the great guitarists in history. As George Harrison was posthumously inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, Prince joined the band – and completely demolished Harrison’s signature Beatles song. Love the song or hate it – this performance is truly magical.

It’s now a year since Prince died, and amongst the hosannas is this amazing oral history of the event from The New York Times.

His three-minute guitar solo is a Prince milestone, a chance to see him outside of the purple-tinted (for once, he is dressed in red) context of his own meticulous studio craft. This was Prince the Lead Guitarist — those chops apparent on songs like “Why You Wanna Treat Me So Bad?,” “Electric Chair” and “When Doves Cry” were given free range to roam. And when he tossed his instrument into the air at the very end of the song, it never appeared to land; it was almost as if Mr. Harrison had grabbed it himself

Source: The Day Prince’s Guitar Wept the Loudest – The New York Times

It’s true – the guitar never does come down. Watch:

Tags: George Harrison, NYTimes, Prince

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 573
  • Next Page »

search

recent

  • Diouf Article
  • Anil Dash: We’re not being alarmist enough about climate change…
  • Learning about Gutenberg
  • From the “I thought I’d heard it all” file
  • One year since his passing: The Day Prince’s Guitar Wept the Loudest

Archives

War Wired Funny Media US Politics Microsoft Arts Sports Social Networks GNE Web Design Google Canadian Politics Personal Browser Email Internet Music Apple Copyfight Software Blogging International Affairs NYTimes Business Canada Montreal Search Test Web Design Friend
Michael Boyle Blog
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2000–2023 · Michael Boyle

Copyright © 2023 · Modern Portfolio Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in