this is mikel.org

Michael Boyle's weblog

  • home
  • archives
  • about
  • words

Archives for December 2005

Andy Baio has noted in

December 31, 2005 by Michael Boyle

Andy Baio has noted in

waxy.org that it looks like Suck.com is gone and may be gone forever. That would be a real shame because, as I have said before, a lot of what’s great about the web can be traced directly back to Suck.com.

Update: It looks like the site is back now – must have been some sort of glitch.

Tags: Archives, History

Wil Wheaton in Salon:

December 23, 2005 by Michael Boyle

Wil Wheaton in Salon:

The real war on Christmas.

Tags: US Politics

Everyone is (rightly) very upset

December 21, 2005 by Michael Boyle

Everyone is (rightly) very upset

about the news that broke last weekend that the US has been spying on American citizens without warrants or other judicial oversight for some time on the authority of the President alone. There are few commentaries better than Scott Rosenberg’s blog post that he published yesterday, if you’re interested in trying to figure out what this is all about.

Tags: US Politics

Do people really believe

December 16, 2005 by Michael Boyle

Do people really believe

that the Liberals leaked a memo about how the Liberal outlook is grim in Quebec? This is precisely the message they want to get out – and that Duceppe is kindly helping the Liberals deliver.

Quebec voters have always been the most strategic voters in Canada. They have constantly demonstrated that they will not let ANY party or leader get too big for his/her boots. So for the Liberals this may in fact be the hail mary strategy – convince everyone that the Bloc is going to win an unprecedented number of seats in Quebec and sit back and hope that voters moderate that in their favour.

Goodness knows they can’t actually get their own message out, so this could be the only option at this point for the Liberals in Quebec.

Tags: Canadian Politics

The big news yesterday

December 16, 2005 by Michael Boyle

The big news yesterday

was that a study published this month in the journal Nature has shown that there isn’t a huge difference in accuracy between Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. I still think it’s a good idea that they’re instituting a more formal review process, but it’s important to keep the problems in perspective.

Tags: Analysis, Quality

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

search

recent

  • Diouf Article
  • Anil Dash: We’re not being alarmist enough about climate change…
  • Learning about Gutenberg
  • From the “I thought I’d heard it all” file
  • One year since his passing: The Day Prince’s Guitar Wept the Loudest

Archives

Canada Sports Web Design Funny Canadian Politics NYTimes Personal Email Google Microsoft War Friend Media Arts Social Networks GNE Software Search Business Browser Montreal Web Wired US Politics Music Blogging Copyfight Design International Affairs Internet Test Apple
Michael Boyle Blog
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2000–2025 · Michael Boyle

Copyright © 2025 · Modern Portfolio Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in