Reed Hundt’s reply to Ralph Nader and Nader’s second volley. On balance, Hundt was right to go explicitly into a discussion of the Telecom Act of 96, but at the same time his argument seems more like empty platitudes, not a reasoned debate. Nader could be more constructive at forming his argument though – he seems to be coming at it from several directions at once. Call it a draw.
Michael Boyle's weblog
