<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Since it was published,</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikel.org/arch/2005/04/since_it_was_pu.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikel.org/arch/2005/04/since_it_was_pu.html</link>
	<description>Michael Boyle's weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.mikel.org/arch/2005/04/since_it_was_pu.html/comment-page-1#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikel.org/?p=2370#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s why I didn&#039;t say anything, either here when you posted the link, on my own site, or in the comments else where. The article is short-sighted and just so much &quot;trade show rah rah&quot; to those of us &quot;in here&quot;, but is useful, to some extent, to &quot;continue preaching to the masses&quot;. Ugh. A few ways to put this. &quot;Preaching to the converted&quot; is pretty much the worst thing we can accuse Ms. Frasier cause I suspect it&#039;s mostly the &quot;been there, done that&quot;&#039;s  who read her (but I&#039;m prolly wrong there).



In fact, I am kind of on the fence with Adaptive Path as a whole lately. The tone in their articles has very much shifted from them talking to the developers/etc, to trying to get an audience with the media and the moneys etc. explaing stuff to them. A good idea to be sure, but hey they were a big part of the dev community... I expect to see Janice, Jeff or that other guy on CNN any day now. ;)



Rambling rambling rambling... sorry. :)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s why I didn&#8217;t say anything, either here when you posted the link, on my own site, or in the comments else where. The article is short-sighted and just so much &#8220;trade show rah rah&#8221; to those of us &#8220;in here&#8221;, but is useful, to some extent, to &#8220;continue preaching to the masses&#8221;. Ugh. A few ways to put this. &#8220;Preaching to the converted&#8221; is pretty much the worst thing we can accuse Ms. Frasier cause I suspect it&#8217;s mostly the &#8220;been there, done that&#8221;&#8216;s  who read her (but I&#8217;m prolly wrong there).</p>
<p>In fact, I am kind of on the fence with Adaptive Path as a whole lately. The tone in their articles has very much shifted from them talking to the developers/etc, to trying to get an audience with the media and the moneys etc. explaing stuff to them. A good idea to be sure, but hey they were a big part of the dev community&#8230; I expect to see Janice, Jeff or that other guy on CNN any day now. ;)</p>
<p>Rambling rambling rambling&#8230; sorry. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

